Uncategorized

catching up

hope all of you are still out there. i had taken a leave of absence from writing posts for my blog. i have no other reason other than ‘life gets in the way’. i have been listening to plenty of good new music lately, seen a few great shows, but also read a number of good books, and so i thought i would start with the latter, especially since the last one really got to me.

as most of my loyal readers know, i am a huge fan of john prine. i think one of the best pieces i ever wrote was around the time he succumbed to covid in the summer of 2020. that hit hard. i still remember putting on a playlist of his and made a few ‘handsome johnnys’ – his favorite cocktail, vodka and ginger ale – and sat on my back porch for quite awhile and tried to figure it out. never did. which brings me to my first book review. the rest are in no particular order.

living in the present with john prine’ – tom piazza

this book essentially chronicles the last few years of his life. after a chance meeting with the author, they seemed to hit off real well. sometimes you meet people like that where you know right away that this is a person i really connect well with, and the feeling seemed to be mutual. john started to reach out to him to spend some time together, including an early chapter that details one of their early bonding sessions where they take john’s newly acquired cherry red 1977 coupe de ville and hit the road to florida. there follow a number of more travel sessions and eventually, with wife fiona’s authorization, discussions start turning to writing a memoir. tom is also a musician (along with being a writer) from new orleans. interview sessions usually involved talking about john’s past while also playing various songs they both liked late into the night.

when people think of john prine they almost always are thinking about his musical legacy, and that is important and should be remembered. this book goes into that a bit, but more importantly it reveals the man behind the music. so if you are a prine fan, that is why you should read this. in the final chapter, after he has died, tom states that he could not listen to john for a whole year, and then once he did he states that it helped bring him back into the present. i don’t often quote the books i review, but let me just share his last paragraph:

‘listening to john, singing along with him or with each other, we can share time, see and hear the same thing, walk the same road for those minutes. we generate a current then, make a moment that transcends the moment, even if only briefly. so the words ‘the end’ don’t really seem to fit here. john’s spirit – everything that is just beyond the reach of words – remains. we are so lucky that, by hearing his voice or singing his songs, we can summon that spirit. living, while we can, in the present.’

i will drink a handsome johnny to that.

‘the name of this band is r.e.m.’ – peter james carlin

this is not an ‘authorized’ biography of the band, as none of the members participated in its writing, but it is well researched and treats them honestly and fairly. as usual it starts looking at their individual childhood experiences and follows them through until the band finally calls it quits in 2011.

i was a fairly early adopter of the band. ‘murmur’ was their first full length album, out in 1983, and even though it took awhile to get national airplay, i can tell you that it was very popular at the campus parties i went to at that time. i know i got hooked, and also sought out the earlier ep, ‘chronic town’. i had been absorbing all kinds of new music since leaving my small midwestern town and heading to college. but this band was different. not punk, and not pop, but a curious mixture of authentic passion and energy. that fact that you couldn’t understand the lyrics, especially in the early years, just added to the alure.

as is my wont, when i get into something i tend to go down rabbit holes, and this was no exception. as i was going through the part of the book where they were recording and touring on the aforementioned albums, i found myself dusting them off and listening all the way through. obviously there were a few cuts that made their way to greatest hits albums and my playlists, but to actually sit down and attentively listen cover to cover was something i likely had not done in nearly forty years. it all came back to me very quickly.

i then started listening to their next 5-6 albums all the way though as i would drive to and fro from work, until i got through ‘automatic for the people’, which is the last album of theirs i really dug my teeth into.

there is a chapter nearer to the end of the book that the author breaks down the overall fanbase to three categories. the first is what he refers to as the ‘murmerers’, people who got on board early and then dropped out not too far after when they got a little more popular and thought they sold out. the next group picked up slightly after that and rode their initial rise to some national recognition, and then the next group that grabbed on when they started having number one hits and albums and also generated an international following.

i might be a hybrid of the first two groups, as i was there at the beginning, kept up with them for a few years, and then slowly moved on at some point, for no good reason i can remember.

so if you are an r.e.m. fan, this might be a good read for you. but at the very least pull out ‘murmur’ and sit down so you can listen all they way through, maybe with a little volume.

‘dylan goes electric’ elijah wald

supposedly the book the recent movie ‘a complete unknown’ was based on. a very thorough accounting of the people and events that lead up to one of the defining moments in rock history – the evening at the 1965 newport folk festival when bob dylan brought out his band with electrical instruments and stunned the audience. even though i have read a number of accountings of the affair over the years in various books, nothing compares to this. in fact, i think you have to be a pretty big fan of both bob and the folk scene of the early sixties to really appreciate this book. i say that because it gets pretty granular as it builds for over 300 pages before it gets to the final scene. i learned a lot, but i found myself speed reading a few times to keep going. maybe go see the movie first (if you haven’t already).

‘heartbreaker’ – mike campbell

an autobiography by tom petty’s lead guitarist. mike was there from the beginning to the end, and was really petty’s most reliable friend for nearly all of his life. this is a remarkable story and if i would recommend one book off this list to start with, this would be it. a hardscrabble beginning to his life, and then a long period of time of playing in various bands around the florida and georgia area before they finally started to make it big after they moved everything out west to california. mike was a big part of the songwriting over the years. so if you are a fan of petty (and really, who isn’t), like guitars, and tales from life on the rock and roll road, this is a great read. his relationship with dylan and harrison was pretty profound.

he is a good writer and is honest with himself. accordingly, he spends a good deal of time on his personal life, including his marriage to his wife of fifty years. he seems like a pretty good dude.

i am not doing it justice. add it to your library.

‘richard manuel: his life in music, from the hawks and bob dylan to the band’- stephen t. lewis

richard was a seminal member of the band, one of the most important bands in rock and roll history. this is a very deep, loving, and honest portrayal of the man. his keyboard playing was obviously very important, but he is mainly known for some of the most soulful singing ever. the band had a unique vocal blend, of which you could argue he was the foundation. this book takes us through his childhood in canada and his early high school bands, to joining ronnie hawkins and the hawks, then being asked to join dylan’s early electric band with the rest of the hawks. after dylan invited the hawks to join him in woodstock after that tour, they eventually got around to forming their own band (‘the band’), and the rest was rock and roll history.

the latter third of the book covers the highs and lows of the band’s career, and the divisive forces that eventually drove them apart. i already knew most of this story, but the author did a lot of research on all of his life and i did learn quite a bit. i am a sponge for anything i can learn about this band, and this is a welcome addition to my catalogue.

a truly talented and remarkable individual, who unfortunately did struggle with insecurities and doubt that eventually did him in. he left us too early.

drums and demons – the tragic journey of jim gordon’ – joel selvin

if you are in a group of fairly knowledgeable music fans and ask the question ‘who are the best ten rock and roll drummers ever?’, i can be pretty certain that no one will say ‘ jim gordon’. but i would, and so would eric clapton. jim gordon became a staple studio drummer as a part of the ‘wrecking crew’ in southern california studios in the sixties, and would be on so many songs that you would know. among them being songs by the beach boys, the monkees, sonny and cher, the ronettes, the byrds, george harrison, john lennon, frank zappa, steely dan, merle haggard, and so many more that it defies belief when you read the partial summary of songs he has played on at the end of the book. he was eventually asked to join a few bands you may have heard of, like derek and the dominoes (he wrote the coda at the end of the title track ‘layla’). he was on joe cocker’s ‘mad dogs and englishmen’ tour. he basically was on nearly everything clapton did in the mid seventies.

he was not a flashy drummer, just one so technically competent and rock steady that he developed a reputation for being exactly where he was supposed to be on the down beat, all the time. as clapton has said of him (and ginger baker), he ‘had time’.

he had the rock and roll world in his hand – until he didn’t. the excesses of the industry and fame, along with his eventual descent into madness due to his progressive mental issues, caused him to spin out of control and eventually be shunned by nearly everyone. he went completely insane in the end and violently murdered his own mom. he spent the rest of his life in prison.

obviously a depressing end, but if you like you some rock and roll history, especially clapton at his low period and the crazy aforementioned mad dogs and englishmen tour, then you might want to pick this one up.

‘doc watson: a life in music’ – eddie huffman

if you are not familiar with doc watson, one of the greatest folk and bluegrass guitarists that ever lived, then first of all you should at least acquaint yourself with him (and his son merle) and his story. but this book is probably more intended for folks who are at least somewhat familiar and would like to do a deep dive into both his personal and artistic life – because both are remarkable. an incredibly well researched book, it takes you from beginning to end on his journey, which was both hard fought and also profound. there are many artists who are considered legendary in the world of folk and bluegrass, but no one was more influential than doc, in my opinion (and the author’s).

it gets pretty granular, so be prepared for that. but i am sometimes asked ‘if you could go back in time, who would you want to see live?’. i have a few doc issues in my library, including some with son merle. but after reading this and watching videos i found online, i am pretty sure i am adding him, in his prime, to that list.

‘my effin life’ – geddy lee

an autobiography from the bass player for the band rush. you are probably saying right about now ‘ wait, mr. redeyegin is a rush fan?’.

yes i am, or at least i was big time when i was in high school. it helped that i was a drummer, and neal peart, their drummer, was one of my heroes.

i stopped listening to them after i went to college, and so the middle part of the book describing making their later albums and world tours was probably the least interesting to me. but i found the rest really enjoyable, or at least very educational. geddy is a great storyteller and tells his tale in a self effacing manner. his descendants were survivors of the holocaust and emigrated to canada where they were able to provide him with a decent suburban life. but being jewish caused him to be rejected by many in his high school, and he sought refuge in music. obviously the next part detailed him meeting the other members of the band and then grinding their way to stardom.

the latter part of the book spends a fair amount of time on neal’s tragedy of losing his daughter in a car crash, and then his eventual struggle with brain cancer. but i found the whole thing to be an enjoyable read and i got through it pretty quickly.

‘loud and clear: the grateful dead’s wall of sound and the quest for audio perfection’ – brian anderson

a very thorough accounting of the history of the grateful dead’s dedication to the quality of the sound that was emanating from their pa system. the band does not get enough credit for the constantly innovative approach that they took – from the early reengineering of existing speakers and amps in the sixties to the eventual monstrous masterpiece, the ‘wall of sound’ in 1974. the band plowed much of their profits back into the development of these systems – and the stage crews and technicians that would be needed to put it all together – for all of their 30 year career. as the author makes clear, there may be no other band that did more to develop the technologies and concepts that revolutionized the live music industry and are still used to this day. it also added a stress level to individual shows when the shit didn’t work. he also chronicles – to an extent i have never seen before – as to how the magnificent ‘wall of sound’ was the cause of their downfall in late 1974, and led to the hiatus the band took till the summer of 1976. as a warning, this gets really technical at times, and i think you need to be a pretty hard core head to really appreciate it.

thanks for staying with me, and i promise there will be more soon.

jason isbell, ‘foxes in the snow’

this just came out this past weekend. i received my copy on saturday and put it on while doing some errands in the car. i knew it was something special right out of the gates. after a long day working outside yesterday, i put it on while relaxing on the back porch and decided it warranted a proper listen.

let me first state that this is his first solo album (without the 400 unit) in ten years. on top of that, it is just him alone with his acoustic guitar. sparse, but captivating. i have now gotten through it maybe 4 times or so, and i am still processing the complexity and brilliance of the lyrics. i should also say that his guitar playing is extremely good. he is well known for his electric playing, especially on the slide, but his acoustic picking here is something i have not heard in a while.

about a year ago he announced his divorce from his wife and fellow band member amanda shires, and he does not deny that the process is the source for some of the material, maybe a majority of it. don’t let that turn you off. just as his journey into sobriety arguably was an inspiration for his 2013 breakthrough album ‘southeastern’, he seems genuinely inspired in both his songwriting and singing on this one. my first impression is that he realizes that at least part of the blame for their dissolution falls on him. knowing him like i do after following his career for over fifteen years, i do not doubt that it is true.

most fans of his think ‘southeastern’ is his finest work, not to be equaled before or since, and i fall in that category. but in just 48 hours of listening, i think this is as close as he has come. i hear echoes of that masterpiece in more than a few numbers. in an interview i just read, he was asked about making the departure to this solo acoustic format, and his reply was that he felt he had been doing the rocking 400 unit format for a while, and at age 46, he felt like he was a bit trapped in that role. i tend to agree. i have declined to catch him much on the road lately, even though i think their last few albums were interesting, because i stopped seeing anything new that i thought was worth my effort.

there are really just a few instances where you can tell that the subject matter is his relationship with amanda – both good and bad. but much of it could possibly be about her, but maybe about other relationships (it was his second marriage). and then there are songs that aren’t about women at all, but possibly tales about his rowdier youth. the title track might be the best song on the album (only jason could reference diphenhydramine in a love song). and then it closes with a song he was asked to write for his brother’s marriage – to be played at their first dance at their reception. he debuted it at that ceremony. nobody had had a chance to hear it before that. i would not be surprised if it is not the last time that song gets played in such a setting.

he is currently on tour solo without his band, featuring this material. i might have to go out and see him. see you there.

2024 nuggets

as i mentioned in my previous post, last year was easily my least productive year in regards to writing to my blog. but that does not mean i was not listening to or going out to see music. i just could not find the time to share it with all of you. so here are a few items i have gone back and selected. there is no rhyme or reason here, and they are in no particular order. just a few things i felt needed to be talked about.

decemberists ‘as it ever was, so it will be again’

starbucks used to sell music at the counter when you were ordering your coffee, and i would usually pick up something maybe once or twice a month if it caught my eye. it has been nearly twenty years since i took a flyer on a band i had never heard of – the decemberists. the album was ‘the crane wife’, and after a spin or two, i was hooked. i have followed them ever since, and have bought pretty much everything they have put out. but i still think that is their best. i had actually been a little disappointed over the last decade or so, until now. this release might not be as good, but it comes close. they had taken a break for a while (or, more accurately, their chief songwriter had), and it seems to have rejuvenated them. a very interesting and diverse collection of songs, as usual. maybe the most unusual is the final piece, called ‘joan in the garden’ which is nearly twenty minutes long. very experimental and sometimes dream like, it ends with a rocking outro that brings it all home. it may take you a few times to digest the whole thing, but it does grow on you.

ray lamontagne ‘long way home’

a similar story here, as i was an early adopter to ray’s stuff, and coincidentally his first album ‘trouble’ came out about the same time as ‘crane wife’. again, i have followed him ever since. my initial draw to him was his 70’s retro sound – somewhat of a hybrid of van morrison, cat stevens, james taylor, etc.

he started to veer away from that after a few successful albums and went a lot heavier and edgier, usually not to the good. but over his last few albums he has come back around and found his groove again. this is a great overall album and served me well over the summer.

billy strings ‘highway prayers’

i know i keep writing about him, but he just keeps pumping out new music and i am just trying to keep up. this album gives us twenty tracks of originals delivered in more traditional bluegrass and country settings, again returning back to the form that made him famous to begin with. (as you can see there is a bit of a theme here).solid playing, and solid songwriting. solid, solid, solid.

johnny blue skies ‘passage du desir’

never heard of johnny blue skies? that’s ok, nobody else had before the release of this album. his real name is sturgill simpson, and you may have heard of him. apparently he had made a promise not to make more than five studio albums at some point, and so adapted this moniker. again, a return to his unique musical stylings and superb songwriting, and this album is one of his best. repeated listenings will be rewarded.

justin townes earle ‘all in – unreleased and rarities (the new west years)’

long time readers of mine will know the love i have for this man’s work, and someone we lost way too early. this is a posthumous collection of material he had recorded but not released from his years with the new west record label. what a songwriter. i hesitated to provide a sample of the material below by choosing his cover of the fleetwood mac hit, but he does it well and i think the video captures him in a beautiful way.

dave alvin and jimmie dale gilmore ‘texicali’

these two veterans of….actually, i am not sure how to describe them. dave alvin made his mark in the l.a. punk/country scene in the 80’s in a band he founded called the blasters. jimmie dale gilmore is from west texas and is maybe best known as one of the members of the flatlanders in the seventies – an early contributor to what would later be dubbed ‘alt-country’, whatever that means.

the two teamed up for an album in 2018 called ‘downey to lubbock’ (their two hometowns), and they have been pretty much touring together ever since. i did buy that album when it came out, and i can recommend as well. this one got stuck in the cd player for a while. good stuff, if you like this sort of thing. and i do.

wyatt flores ‘half life’

here is a fairly new artist that i picked up on the sirius xm ‘outlaw country’ station. wyatt hails from the red dirt country in oklahoma, where so many great artists have blossomed from over the last 15-20 years. this is an ep, so only about 8 songs with a running time of about 25 minutes. but please give him a listen. another theme of all of my selections here was that i played them a lot, because they all deserved that kind of attention. this one is no different. latch on to him now before anyone else does, so you can say you heard him when.

two summer considerations

sometimes when i listen to a new release it almost seems to write itself right out of the gates. two that i have been listening to fall into that category.

tommy emmanuel – ‘accomplice two’

i got turned on to this one from a review in no depression magazine. i have heard his name before and have seen him on videos playing with other artists that i admire. the word ‘accomplice’ in the title refers to the fact that each cut here is a collaboration with another artist(s), and ‘two’ refers to the fact that this is his second installment. when i read the review, i hit the purchase button automatically because, for the most part, they were all people that were in my wheelhouse.

first of all, if you were also not very familiar with his name, let me say that, of all the reviews i read, many used the term ‘a guitarist’s guitarist’. he is an extraordinarily gifted acoustic guitarist, and he dabbles in a number of genres.

i will give you a broad sampling of who he plays with here, and i will tell you that if you were like me and have a lot of these people in your musical collection, you should probably just stop here and get it. billy strings, molly tuttle, sam bush, nitty gritty dirt band, little feat, jorma kaokonen, jerry douglas, jamey johnson, david grisman, michael mcdonald, and many more.

really well done.

molly and tommy doing towne van zandt’s ‘white freight liner blues’. i saw her with her band in new orleans about a month ago. please make and effort to see her. she is going places.

van morrison – ‘moving on skiffle’

i just got this one two days ago, and have gotten through it twice, but i have heard enough to try to entice you to add it to your early summer playlist. his last two projects spent a lot of energy on his political disagreements with the covid lockdown policies – especially, but not limited to, their effects on the music business. somewhat controversial in some people minds, but van has never been one to back down on how he feels, and i respect him for that.

for this session he returns to the skiffle era that he first started in back in the sixties. this is not a genre that i am very familiar with, but you don’t need to be either to get sucked into the energy. and in fact, they are not all done in the skiffle style, and they are not all skiffle songs from that era. of the 23 songs, about half are traditional covers of standards, with new arrangements by van, and the other half are covers of american folk and country artists such as hank williams, roy acuff, jim reeves, jimmy rodgers, elizabeth cotton, and so on.

backed by a crack band that can keep up with him in any style, van rides on top of it all with his distinctive vocal prowess. at 77 he can still bring it. i was listening to the last half a dozen tracks or so on the way into work this morning as the sun was coming up, and it just put a smile on my face.

give it a chance.

‘get back’, the beatles

well, i have been waiting for this for a long time, and i finally got to watch the finished product when it debuted over the weekend. originally scheduled to be released in movie theaters about this time last year, the schedule was changed a number of times due to covid and other editorial reasons. directed by peter jackson, they eventually settled on a three part documentary to be available for streaming in three episodes.

the original premise was to revisit the 55 hours of footage taken of the recording of the ‘let it be’ album, which had been in a vault for 50 years untouched. the filming was used to create a documentary to coincide with the release of the album, which eventually did happen in 1970. although i have not seen that in a long time (and i could not find a current version on any streaming services i have), there is some thought that the way the material was presented for that version gave support to the theory that yoko ono was one of the drivers of the band breaking up soon after the album was released. i also recall that it gave the impression that the sessions were full of tension.

paul and ringo, as well as the surviving spouses of john and george (yoko and olivia), gave full support to the project, and gave jackson full latitude to present it as he saw fit. i get the impression from interviews that they all disagreed with the premise of the first one, and were hoping to have the world see it for how it really was. and maybe they succeeded.

so here are a few of my takeaways after watching all three episodes:

  1. it is a lot of material, with the whole thing clocking in at 8 hours. this is the main criticism it has received, and i think that it is warranted if you are only a casual and curious beatles observer. however, if you are a student of the band’s history, it gives significant granularity to what happened during this critical era. nearly all of it had to be presented to show the true dynamics between the band members, and the pressure of the situation they were under. maybe it could have been trimmed an hour or so, but i was fine with the length. i watched one each night.
  2. as opposed to the aforementioned tension, it seems clear to me that they were still great friends, but sometimes cracked under pressure. the original project was to write and record fourteen songs in about three weeks, perform a live concert immediately after that, and have the film and album released that summer. they were disciplined in the studio, and got through the stress by constantly joking around. that is a constant throughout all three episodes. sure, george quits the band at the end of the first episode. but he was trying to make a point and eventually they came around to him.
  3. usually lennon gets the blame for the tension in the studios, but the footage presented here shows that it might have been mccartney. their previous manager died unexpectedly, and paul was trying to assert himself to keep things going. when pushed back on this, he said something to the effect that they needed a leader, and he was only doing it because no one else would. but i also think that he is the creative leader for this portion of their career, and the shots of them writing songs from scratch show that. others may see it differently.
  4. as for yoko, she may get a little vindication here. it is pretty annoying in the first episode when she is sitting in a chair between john and paul all the time while they are playing. but she certainly isn’t intervening – she just sits there and writes or sows. as the episodes move on, she is barely involved or seen, and indeed linda eastman (later mccartney) is around a lot more. maybe yoko was more involved in the abbey road sessions, which were recorded later that summer, but she seems pretty benign here.

all in all i learned a lot. and i will probably watch it again in the not to distant future, to see if i pick up things i missed before. i would encourage you to at least watch the two trailers to get a feel for it. the first one here is from peter jackson from last year, explaining why the movie was being delayed, and the second is the official trailer for the final release.

enjoy.